What sort of deal? Does one player concede for a share of the prizemoney? (Apologies for my ignorance on what occurs in such tournaments).Originally Posted by Scott Colliver
What sort of deal? Does one player concede for a share of the prizemoney? (Apologies for my ignorance on what occurs in such tournaments).Originally Posted by Scott Colliver
184000 sounds impressive as long as they weren't Zimbabwean dollarsOriginally Posted by Kevin Bonham
![]()
Perhaps the deal came about because James was being obstinate.![]()
DJ
...I don't want to go among mad people Alice remarked, "Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: we're all mad here. I am mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice. "You must be," said the Cat ,"or you wouldn't have come here."
At a point during the final table the players can, provided they all agree stop the play and them divide the remaining prize money up different (more evenly) in a way they all agree to. Some money is resevered for the winner so that after the deal the players are stilling playing for something. This means that although $184000 (US dollars) was the advertised first prize it is not necessarily what James Obst won.Originally Posted by Kevin Bonham
Scott
Well done James![]()
![]()
"I give 98 percent of my mental energy to chess. Others give only 2 percent." -- Bobby Fischer
James Obst and Kerry Stead have both picked up cashes in the Aussie Millions.
Stead in events 1, 3 (7th), 11 (14th) and Obst event 7 (4th)
Scott
Three cashes is very impressive indeed, well done Kerry. I suspect James is still looking for his first big live score.Originally Posted by Scott Colliver
I think he has about 5 live cashes, with this last one being his biggest and highest placing as far as I know.Originally Posted by pax
Scott
for someone who knows very little about poker how much would they have actually won ?Originally Posted by Scott Colliver
cheers
Garrett.
Off the top of my head - Obst got about 40k from his one cash - Stead cashes were much smaller probably about 15k in total. Obst also picked up 20k US for finishing in the money at a poker tournament in London last year, but he has won over 1.6 million US in online tournaments over the last 3 or so years. He was banned from major sites for some of that time because he was playing underage.Originally Posted by Garrett
Scott
I'm not a chess player but I thought that you guys might want to root for one of your own in Vegas ... you can follow Kerry Stead's progress here. He is doing very well for an Aussie.
http://www.wsop.com/tournaments/chip...852&dayof=1535
FWIW - H.O.R.S.E is like the decthalon of poker. Go Kerry!
It appears that James Obst went quite well in this years WSOP!
http://www.pokerasiapacific.com/obst...bles41513.html
GO THE DRAGONS!
GO Western Sydney Wanderers!
This is the reason I do not wade into religion threads.Originally Posted by Adamski's signature
Nice result against Hellmuth.
Out of interest, wasnt Oepty the guy who was against betting in chess ?
Or was that another Oepty ?
Ruin is formal, devil's work,
Consecutive and slow -
Fail in an instance no man did,
Slipping - is Crash's law,
Moderation Requests: All requests for, comments about, or questions about moderation of any kind including thread changes must be posted in the Help and Feedback section and not on the thread in question. (Or by private message for routine changes or sensitive matters.)
ACF Newsletter Information - All Australian players and administrators should subscribe and check each issue for relevant notices
My psephology/politics site (token chess references only) : http://kevinbonham.blogspot.com.au/ Politics twitter feed https://twitter.com/kevinbonham
Ruin is formal, devil's work,
Consecutive and slow -
Fail in an instance no man did,
Slipping - is Crash's law,
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)