Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    Mr Bulldogs Paul S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    758

    Stinginess of Chess Players

    One of the major problems in Australian Chess is the stinginess of most chess players. Those of you who subscibed to Australian Chess Forum would remember the excellent editorial from Shaun Press about 2 years ago on this matter.

    Is it any wonder that Australian Chess is in decline when many chess players object to even paying trivial sums like $20/$25 to become a member of their State Association and some even object to paying $10 to become a member of their local chess club? Remember that in NSW that due to licenced club subsidies, for around $10 to $20 membership of a chess club you get rent free premises, all equipment supplied, club pays for interclub entry fees, club pays for trophies etc etc. IMHO Australian Chess would be better off without these sorts of people, who just expect everything for free and just take advantage of others but contribute absolutely nothing themselves and just whinge all the time. These sorts of people just discourage the relatively few chess organisers there are from wanting to bother to continue to contribute their time and effort into chess administration. No wonder a lot of people get p***** off with chess admin after a while and leave!

    For about 6 months of my time on the NSWCA Council last year I was the main contact person for enquiries. Occasionally I would be asked "where is the NSWCA Office?"!!! IMHO a proper office with at least one full time staff member would be a great thing for a state chess organisation (or the ACF!) and would help considerably to boost the profile of chess. However, this is not feasible with the miserly income stream coming into State Chess Association coffers and you have 1) so many freeloaders on the system (eg games are ACF rated for non-members) and 2) a lot of existing members object to paying as "much" as they already are. A full-time office is just one of many things that Australian chess needs if it is ever to progress!

    Another example of stinginess of chess players was the absurd reaction on this Bulletin Board over the ACF spending $50 for best BB post of 2003. In the end I got sick of it and just donated the $50 prize myself!

    Over the years I have heard comments from people that "groups like Jews/Scots etc are stingy with money". Well, as a group the most stingy group of people I have come across when it comes to money matters is the average Australian Chess Player (even allowing for the fact that some chess players are in genuine financial difficulty)!
    Last edited by Paul S; 25-06-2004 at 04:27 PM.

  2. #2
    CC International Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wynyard,Tas
    Posts
    2,213
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul S
    Another example of stinginess of chess players was the absurd reaction on this Bulletin Board over the ACF spending $50 for best BB post of 2003. In the end I got sick of it and just donated the $50 prize myself!
    At risk of taking this off-topic on the first response, I was one of the objectors and my objection was not on the basis of stinginess (it wasn't coming out of my pocket) but the symbolism of having a monetary reward when so many tasks are performed voluntarily and considerable achievements over the board receive relatively low rewards. In my opinion the competition was a bit of a joke (as it indeed transpired) and would be appropriately rewarded with something silly.

    I think this is getting close to the 50,000th time that it has been asserted that objections to the prize are attributable to stinginess so I think that needs to be laid to rest before new readers start believing it.

  3. #3
    Reader in Slood Dynamics Rincewind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The multiverse
    Posts
    21,570
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Rout
    At risk of taking this off-topic on the first response, I was one of the objectors and my objection was not on the basis of stinginess (it wasn't coming out of my pocket) but the symbolism of having a monetary reward when so many tasks are performed voluntarily and considerable achievements over the board receive relatively low rewards. In my opinion the competition was a bit of a joke (as it indeed transpired) and would be appropriately rewarded with something silly.

    I think this is getting close to the 50,000th time that it has been asserted that objections to the prize are attributable to stinginess so I think that needs to be laid to rest before new readers start believing it.
    Hear, hear!
    So einfach wie möglich, aber nicht einfacher - Albert Einstein

  4. #4
    CC Grandmaster arosar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5,046
    Stingy. My butt stingy. This is just plain bull-schit this whole business. How can chess players be effing stingy when they regularly haul their asse.s off to places like Canberra, Mexico, toad country and all that just to play chess? That costs quite a bit. How's about the smackers spent on books, CDs, entry fees? What's so f**kin' stingy about that? Listen here Paulie....you're an alright bas.tard in me book .... but geez mate....you whine about other people too much!

    AR

  5. #5
    CC International Master JGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,120
    Stingy im also not sure when I have seen some of the unbelievebly expensive entrance cost for some of the tournaments advertised on the net. Some over 100 $ and the Victorian masters what were they asking for? What are the super benifts that the players recieve after forking out these dollars? Some tournaments add that its a great chance to get your ELO, wow?! If someone is looking at 'paying' for an elo it can be done for about the same price 'guaranteed' (although illegally).

  6. #6
    CC Grandmaster Alan Shore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Crane, Poole & Schmidt
    Posts
    3,871
    Doh, I hit some button and my post got lost.. take 2 then... more condensed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paul S
    Is it any wonder that Australian Chess is in decline when many chess players object to even paying trivial sums like $20/$25 to become a member of their State Association and some even object to paying $10 to become a member of their local chess club?
    I have no qualms paying a membership to a chess club, my club is great (Uni of QLD) and they have plenty of events with lots of prizes on offer.

    However, my partucular state association does nothing for me but send 3 dodgy newsletter per year, so I very much resent having to pay for that.

    Another example of stinginess of chess players was the absurd reaction on this Bulletin Board over the ACF spending $50 for best BB post of 2003. In the end I got sick of it and just donated the $50 prize myself!
    No one asked you to.. It was nice of you to do so though.

    Over the years I have heard comments from people that "groups like Jews/Scots etc are stingy with money". Well, as a group the most stingy group of people I have come across when it comes to money matters is the average Australian Chess Player (even allowing for the fact that some chess players are in genuine financial difficulty)!
    As Amiel already attested to, there are many purchases made by chess players regarding products, tournament entry fees, etc. There's also the question of what you're really referring to.. what is it exactly chess players (very large generalisation) 'won't pay for'? Would you want to pay for things of no use to you?

    For example, I use FICS (freechess.org) and enjoy it very much. Yet people pay to use the Internet Chess Club (ICC). Does that make me stingy? No, it makes me smart not to waste money on features I wouldn't use, or could use just as easily as a guest on there. There are many, many other reasons I am anti-ICC though...

    Finally, I think there are those players who genuinely are in some financial difficulty.. chess doesn't exactly pay a lot. I'm still a student and since I have very limited income while studying full-time I don't have all the cash in the world to splash around on chess. I would agree with you that it's wrong for those that have money to be stingy but keep in mind there are those that don't.
    "I can't go back to yesterday because I was a different person then."
    - White Queen, Alice through the Looking-Glass

  7. #7
    CC Grandmaster Garvinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Dickinson
    However, my partucular state association does nothing for me but send 3 dodgy newsletter per year, so I very much resent having to pay for that.
    now now bruce, stop misrepresenting the situation, in that newsletter you get plenty of recycled results from here, you get information displayed on graemes site and you also get advertising of how to buy chess products. that is worth ten dollars isnt it :p

  8. #8
    CC Grandmaster Alan Shore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Crane, Poole & Schmidt
    Posts
    3,871
    Quote Originally Posted by ggrayggray
    now now bruce, stop misrepresenting the situation, in that newsletter you get plenty of recycled results from here, you get information displayed on graemes site and you also get advertising of how to buy chess products. that is worth ten dollars isnt it :p
    How to buy products from the producer of said shoddy newsletter so he can get more money for his retirement fund....
    "I can't go back to yesterday because I was a different person then."
    - White Queen, Alice through the Looking-Glass

  9. #9
    CC Grandmaster Garvinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Dickinson
    How to buy products from the producer of said shoddy newsletter so he can get more money for his retirement fund....
    your not talking about the blatant advertising on the back page for chess products from a particular store are you and how that advertising is about 100 font size larger than the tournament schedule

  10. #10
    Illuminati Bill Gletsos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    16,584
    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Cox
    Hear, hear!
    Yes, Ian summed it up nicely.

  11. #11
    Mr Bulldogs Paul S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    758
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Rout
    I think this is getting close to the 50,000th time that it has been asserted that objections to the prize are attributable to stinginess so I think that needs to be laid to rest before new readers start believing it.
    Actually its more like about the 5th time (not 50,000th time).

    But you have a point though Ian - my mentioning of this around 5 times in recent months is excessive - its just that I sometimes get carried away and over-excited on this forum!
    Last edited by Paul S; 26-06-2004 at 12:48 AM.

  12. #12
    Mr Bulldogs Paul S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    758
    Quote Originally Posted by arosar
    Stingy. My butt stingy. This is just plain bull-schit this whole business. How can chess players be effing stingy when they regularly haul their asse.s off to places like Canberra, Mexico, toad country and all that just to play chess? That costs quite a bit. How's about the smackers spent on books, CDs, entry fees? What's so f**kin' stingy about that? Listen here Paulie....you're an alright bas.tard in me book .... but geez mate....you whine about other people too much!

    AR
    Steady on, Amiel. After all, I was just doing your old trick of trying to liven up this forum (which has been somewhat dull over the last several weeks) by making a mildly controversial post. :p If you and Chesslover had been doing your "job" in recent weeks then there would have been no need for me to make such a post!

    I probably should not have given the impression that my initial post refers to every chess player and yes, I recognise that some players have limited financial means (which is a factor that needs to be taken into consideration). Perhaps a more accurate/precise description would be to say that the average chess player is stingy when it comes to spending (or donating) money on chess activities that are NOT of direct benefit to him (such as becoming a member of their local state chess association or contributing to the Olympiad Fund) but which benefit chess as a whole. Amiel, the activities you mention such as playing interstate (which only a small percentage of chess players do) and buying chess books/CDs are activities that the player does for his own self benefit, and not for the benefit of chess as a whole.
    Last edited by Paul S; 26-06-2004 at 12:50 AM.

  13. #13
    CC Grandmaster Garvinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    13,087
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul S
    Amiel, the activities you mention such as playing interstate (which only a small percentage of chess players do) and buying chess books/CDs are activities that the player does for his own self benefit, and not for the benefit of chess as a whole.
    a point that has been discussed before at length in regards to volunteering.

  14. #14
    CC Grandmaster Alan Shore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Crane, Poole & Schmidt
    Posts
    3,871
    Quote Originally Posted by ggrayggray
    a point that has been discussed before at length in regards to volunteering.
    And is a separate issue to that which you brought up.
    "I can't go back to yesterday because I was a different person then."
    - White Queen, Alice through the Looking-Glass

  15. #15
    Mr Bulldogs Paul S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    758
    Oh no, It looks like the "Thread Police" (Garvin and Bruce) are on to me!

    Sorry "policemen", but IMHO I was still on topic when I responded to Amiel (although I'll admit my response could encourage others to respond to my response and so eventually go "off topic").

    As the originator of this thread, I say that I should decide what is (and what is NOT) off topic in this thread, and that this should not be for the "Joh Bjelke-Petersen Queensland Thread Police" to decide!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How to increase chess participation.
    By ursogr8 in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 22-04-2005, 05:02 PM
  2. A Survey of Chess Players
    By ChessGuru in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 22-07-2004, 02:38 PM
  3. australian chess and sex
    By chesslover in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 24-03-2004, 10:24 AM
  4. The role of clubs in chess
    By chesslover in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-02-2004, 06:00 PM
  5. Chess Champs - Chess players party!!
    By george in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 15-01-2004, 08:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •