Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    CC Grandmaster Garvinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004

    40 moves in x time control

    This one comes from a post by 1min gm in the forgetting to press clock thread:

    Quote Originally Posted by 1 min gm
    3) This problem (2) is made more serious when ridiculous time controls such as "90 mins for the first 40 moves" are used. In such cases, the digital clock is pre-set to count how many moves are made according to how many times it is pressed. If for a move (or even more), the clock is not pressed, then players may lose on time even though they have supposedly successfully reached the time control. That is, they may have made 40 moves, are thinking about their 41st move, and they suddently find they have lost on time.
    First suggestion, dont use the move counter for the problems with above.

    Thoughts on the rest?

  2. #2
    Monster of the deep Kevin Bonham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    It should be possible to use the scoresheets to determine the correct move number and then adjust the move number on the clock. If there is a dispute between clock and scoresheet as to move number then the scoresheet should take priority unless there is evidence it is wrong (eg a player writing down the same moves twice). If a player has reached the time control according to the scoresheet and the scoresheet is correct then a flagfall shown on the clock is not binding as the evidence of having reached the time control demonstrates the clock is wrong.

    If both players aren't scoring and the game can't be otherwise reconstructed it is quite possible that a player could lose on time while having actually made enough moves. But that's a bit of a tree-falls-in-the-forest scenario since they would not know that they had lose on time unfairly.

    I agree that controls at specific move numbers are best avoided.
    Moderation Requests: All requests for, comments about, or questions about moderation of any kind including thread changes must be posted in the Help and Feedback section and not on the thread in question. (Or by private message for routine changes or sensitive matters.)

    ACF Newsletter Information - All Australian players and administrators should subscribe and check each issue for relevant notices

    My psephology/politics site (token chess references only) : Politics twitter feed

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Charles Robert Darwin 1809-1882
    By antichrist in forum Religion and Science
    Replies: 150
    Last Post: 04-09-2013, 02:18 PM
  2. Melbourne Chess Club Calendar for 2006
    By Bereaved in forum Completed Tournaments
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 30-07-2006, 10:08 PM
  3. incremental time control
    By Garvinator in forum General Chess Chat
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 17-03-2005, 07:16 PM
  4. Minimum time control for standard rating
    By Rincewind in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 24-04-2004, 10:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts