Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: String theory

  1. #1
    CC Grandmaster antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    21,064

    String theory - split from Old ACF Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by chesslover
    I think my posts are better than your anti-Jesus, satan worshipping, devil loving crap that you sometimes post
    CL
    Love your enemies - bit unrealistic isn't it?

    Did JC love his enemies? No, he consigned to Hell forever for blah, blah, blah

    We have evolved into the wrong thread.

    A challenge -- can anyone think of anything that has not evolved?
    Last edited by Kevin Bonham; 04-02-2004 at 11:44 PM. Reason: retitle thread

  2. #2
    Account Permanently Banned PHAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    4,254
    Quote Originally Posted by antichrist
    A challenge -- can anyone think of anything that has not evolved?
    The "strings" in String Theory.

  3. #3
    CC Grandmaster antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    21,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew Sweeney
    The "strings" in String Theory.
    I can't see why they would not have evolved but I will let a scientifically-minded person answer it fully.

  4. #4
    Account Permanently Banned PHAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    4,254
    Quote Originally Posted by antichrist
    I can't see why they would not have evolved but I will let a scientifically-minded person answer it fully.
    Cosmology is not my area. However, my limited understanding of string theory is that the "strings" came into being at the first instant of the big bang and have not changed since. Remember, it is still only a theory which has not become a paradigm.

  5. #5
    CC Grandmaster antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    21,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew Sweeney
    Cosmology is not my area. However, my limited understanding of string theory is that the "strings" came into being at the first instant of the big bang and have not changed since. Remember, it is still only a theory which has not become a paradigm.
    If we accept universes collapsing in and re-exploding then they would be evolving

  6. #6
    Reader in Slood Dynamics Rincewind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The multiverse
    Posts
    21,575
    Quote Originally Posted by antichrist
    A challenge -- can anyone think of anything that has not evolved?
    Define "evolved".
    So einfach wie möglich, aber nicht einfacher - Albert Einstein

  7. #7
    chmod -x /bin/chmod
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,193
    Quote Originally Posted by antichrist
    A challenge -- can anyone think of anything that has not evolved?
    Space

  8. #8
    Account Permanently Banned PHAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    4,254
    Quote Originally Posted by antichrist
    If we accept universes collapsing in and re-exploding then they would be evolving
    No, they would be being created once and destroyed once. They spend 20 billion years going zzzzzzzzzzzzz then nothing. Thus they have not changed from one thing into another, ie not evolved.

    The latest info suggest that there will be no big crunch - just a "cold death." I find this prospect unsatisfyingly asymetric.

  9. #9
    Account Permanently Banned PHAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    4,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeo
    Space
    Your intracranial void?

  10. #10
    CC Grandmaster antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    21,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Cox
    Define "evolved".
    A good dictionary definition is sufficient, I am away from home so can't help. Basically, changing form

  11. #11
    CC Grandmaster antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    21,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeo
    Space
    It went from non-existence, before BB to existence, and is expanding, so of course evolves.

  12. #12
    CC Grandmaster antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    21,064
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew Sweeney
    No, they would be being created once and destroyed once. They spend 20 billion years going zzzzzzzzzzzzz then nothing. Thus they have not changed from one thing into another, ie not evolved.

    Something else has evolved into them, then them into something else.

    The latest info suggest that there will be no big crunch - just a "cold death." I find this prospect unsatisfyingly asymetric.
    I don't try to follow latest science, never-ending

  13. #13
    chmod -x /bin/chmod
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Matthew Sweeney
    Your intracranial void?
    thats the lamest comment made, ever.

  14. #14
    CC Grandmaster Garvinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    13,370
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeo
    thats the lamest comment made, ever.
    that is a big call especially with some of the other posts on this bb

  15. #15
    chmod -x /bin/chmod
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,193
    His rating sucks, hes an idiot, hes annoying and hes a dumbass.

    If theres anyone with an "intracranial void" in this world, it has to be him, without a doubt.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A challenge for forensic historians
    By ursogr8 in forum Australian Chess History
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 06-05-2020, 03:13 PM
  2. French Closed Tarrasch (and French Winawer) theory
    By Kevin Bonham in forum Games and Analysis
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 07-07-2012, 11:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •