Tournament results

[Kerry Stead]

cause i dont like the idea of having to wipe the omelette off my suit if I was to proclaim jgb as the winner and then something happened and he was overtaken ie games not played, forfeits(which are a chance if ppl dont keep moving very soon ) etc.

Even with these unfortunate events happening, JGB has enough points to have everyone covered.
Well done James!

[JGB]

Even with these unfortunate events happening, JGB has enough points to have everyone covered.
Well done James!

Thanks mate, was a good tournament. Im not sure how many other games are still in progress, but Kaitlin and I have some unfinished business.

[Mischa]

Well done James!

[Garvinator]

No Name               Total  1   2   3   4   5   6   7 

1   JGB               9.5    *  2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
2  Kerry STEAD        9.0   0.0  *  1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
3   GGRAYGGRAY        7.5   .5  1.0  *  0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
4   1 MIN GRANDMASTER 3.0   0.0 0.0 1.0  *          2.0
5   TCN               2.0   0.0 0.0 0.0      *      2.0
6   KAITLIN           2.0   0.0 0.0 0.0          *  2.0
7   BUNTA             0.0   0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  *

[Garvinator]

Thanks mate, was a good tournament. Im not sure how many other games are still in progress, but Kaitlin and I have some unfinished business.

and Jason and myself have an interesting game still to go.

[Trent Parker]

Jgb

well done! You kicked butt!

[Garvinator]

No Name               Total  1   2   3   4   5   6   7 

1   JGB               9.5    *  2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
2  Kerry STEAD        9.0   0.0  *  1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
3   GGRAYGGRAY        8.5   .5  1.0  *  1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
4   1 MIN GRANDMASTER 3.0   0.0 0.0 1.0  *          2.0
5   TCN               2.0   0.0 0.0 0.0      *      2.0
6   KAITLIN           2.0   0.0 0.0 0.0          *  2.0
7   BUNTA             0.0   0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  *

[Garvinator]

No Name               Total  1   2   3   4   5   6   7 

1   JGB               11.5   *  2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
2  Kerry STEAD        9.0   0.0  *  1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
3   GGRAYGGRAY        8.5   .5  1.0  *  1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
4   1 MIN GRANDMASTER 7.0   0.0 0.0 1.0  *  2.0 2.0 2.0
5   TCN               4.0   0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  *  2.0 2.0
6   KAITLIN           2.0   0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  *  2.0
7   BUNTA             0.0   0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  *

[Glenno]

The final standings are as follows:

Place - Name - Score - Berger
1 - JGB - 11.5 - 56.25
2 - ggrayggray - 9.5 - 42.75
3 - Kerry Stead - 8 - 26.00
4 - 1min_grandmaster - 5 - 17.50
5 - Kaitlin - 4 - 10.00
6 - the chess nut - 4 - 8.00
7 - Bunta - 0 - 0.00

[Garvinator]

how do you get those numbers?

For myself-

jgb- 0.5 out of 2
Kerry- 1 out of 2
1gm- 1 out of 2
tcn- 2 out of 2
kaitlin- 2 out of 2
bunta- 2 out of 2.

That makes 8.5 points

[Glenno]

how do you get those numbers?

For myself-

jgb- 0.5 out of 2
Kerry- 1 out of 2
1gm- 1 out of 2
tcn- 2 out of 2
kaitlin- 2 out of 2
bunta- 2 out of 2.

That makes 8.5 points

Thanks for the corrections. The adjusted final standings is now listed below:

Place - Name - Score - Berger
1 - JGB - 11.5 - 56.75
2 - Kerry Stead - 9 - 34.50
3 - ggrayggray - 8.5 - 35.75
4 - 1min_grandmaster - 5 - 16.50
5 - Kaitlin - 4 - 10.00
6 - the chess nut - 4 - 8.00
7 - Bunta - 0 - 0.00

Kaitlin was placed ahead of tcn because of Kaitlin had the higher Berger value.

[Garvinator]

Kaitlin was placed ahead of tcn because of Kaitlin had the higher Berger value.

but kaitlin only got points from bunta's forfeited games. That means she is on 2 points, not four.

Also all the game results and standings are done through swiss perfect.

[Glenno]

but kaitlin only got points from bunta's forfeited games. That means she is on 2 points, not four.

Also all the game results and standings are done through swiss perfect.

Thanks for another correction. Now the final standings should look like this:

Place - Name - Score - Berger
1 - JGB - 11.5 - 56.75
2 - Kerry Stead - 9 - 34.50
3 - ggrayggray - 8.5 - 33.75
4 - 1min_grandmaster - 7 - 20.50
5 - the chess nut - 4 - 4.00
6 - Kaitlin - 2 - 0.00
7 - Bunta - 0 - 0.00

[Garvinator]

and your table Glenno looks suspiciously like my table in post 38 without the tie break cause there were no ties to break.

[Glenno]

and your table Glenno looks suspiciously like my table in post 38 without the tie break cause there were no ties to break.

I agree.