Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    CC Candidate Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    288
    A big thank you to all the children, parents and carers who attended the trivia and fun night to raise money for the Red Cross Tsunami appeal. Over $65.00 was raised.

    The overall winners were the team from Canberra. Congratulations to all concerned.

    Highlights of the nights included some sensational paper planes which flew substantial distances (some budding aeronautical engineers must have been present); full marks to every under 10 child in the spelling competition; extremely high scores overall - especially in the maths sections. Well done to all teams! In fact, every team won at least one section - and were able to choose a small prize each.

    Thank you to George for being a great compare, to Garvin for helping to purchase the prizes (bus trip to Mansfield), to Max for keeping a running score for the different teams, to Julie and Greg for checking the answers and to Laurie and David for helping to put the chairs and tables away. Particular thanks to Alex who did a terrific job organising the questions.

  2. #17
    CC FIDE Master Duff McKagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    711

    Another post mortem

    I hope that next years organisers will take note of lessons learnt from this years events at Mount Buller. Its probably better to hold important events like this in a major city where resources and facilities are readily available. If we are doing it for the chess then i think paying Italian IMs in some sort of package deal using the operating funds is not optimal. Consider that if you had $100000 to utilise in the open division, why not just have $50000 for first place if you want people to come play. Im sure that would attract quite a few more entrants of high calibre. Also the scaling of prize funds from 1st to 12th I think is just shoe shining for the top players. If they want it they have to play like they want it. As for two rounds per day, its highly exhausting on players and coaches, why not stick to one? Its supposed to be organised for the chess, not organised around other constraints. Another weird phenomenom from the juniors: 15 minute 0 increment playoff games after a normal round time control that had 60 second increment? Surely the playoff could include increment also, even were it 15+5.
    Some good things i noticed in Mount Buller were the good behaviour of the juniors and coaches and the hard work of Alex Saint.
    Lets hope that we have a good one in 2006.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mt Buller Australian Minor Chess Championships
    By cincinnatus in forum Mt Buller Chess
    Replies: 202
    Last Post: 24-01-2005, 02:44 PM
  2. Should post counts be for this board only?
    By Kevin Bonham in forum Help and Feedback
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 23-09-2004, 02:53 PM
  3. Mt Buller - Chess World letter to ACF
    By ChessGuru in forum Mt Buller Chess
    Replies: 210
    Last Post: 17-07-2004, 11:58 AM
  4. Replies: 395
    Last Post: 16-07-2004, 02:37 PM
  5. HOW to choose the best ACF BB post in 2003?
    By chesslover in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 16-02-2004, 06:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •