Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23
  1. #16
    CC Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14,441
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Bonham View Post
    The player getting the norm needs to score all their points over the board rather than by forfeit, and the number of games credited for the norm is only the number of games they play over the board. So 6/8 plus a forfeit would have been valid but only an 8-game norm. (In that case a player can claim the title based on 26 rather than 27 games.) 5/8 plus a forfeit is not a norm.

    Forfeits in games not involving the norm-seeker are irrelevant. In this case Hague forfeited rounds 7 and 9 but played Stojic in round 8 and Clarke in round 6.

    Forfeits affect the rating rules. A round robin with any forfeits is reported for rating as if a Swiss.

    Mobile phone defaults once a game has started are treated as normal losses for both norm and rating purposes.
    If the reason for the forfeits was purely ''lost of motivation'' (as suggested by Alex in his blog) then I wonder if NZ chess Federation has something to say about it.
    Interested in Chess Lessons?
    Email webbaron!@gmail.com for more Info!

  2. #17
    Monster of the deep Kevin Bonham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    38,894
    Rather a lot of short draws in this tournament.
    Moderation Requests: All requests for, comments about, or questions about moderation of any kind including thread changes must be posted in the Help and Feedback section and not on the thread in question. (Or by private message for routine changes or sensitive matters.)

    ACF Newsletter Information - All Australian players and administrators should subscribe and check each issue for relevant notices

    My psephology/politics site (token chess references only) : http://kevinbonham.blogspot.com.au/ Politics twitter feed https://twitter.com/kevinbonham

  3. #18
    CC International Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,197
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Bonham View Post
    Rather a lot of short draws in this tournament.
    Well, the average age in this tournament is 45. Just for comparison, in the Leonid's tournament it is 28.

  4. #19
    CC Candidate Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    70
    Congratulations Dusan on your norm!

  5. #20
    CC FIDE Master Metro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    953
    Quote Originally Posted by Narelle View Post
    Congratulations Dusan on your norm!
    Yes to both Brandon and Dusan

  6. #21
    CC FIDE Master Metro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    953
    And a word from Aleks:
    This was indeed the strangest tournament I can think of right now. There are many things to think about, not only about the incident but how I let it affect me, but how tournaments should handle such situations in future.

    I spoke to Izzat at length after our very short draw. It was a way to put this whole mess behind us, which affected both of us badly. One thing we agree on completely is that it is up to the governing bodies of chess to regulate in such a manner that ambiguity is eliminated.
    http://doubleroo.blogspot.com/

  7. #22
    CC Grandmaster Desmond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The island
    Posts
    13,245
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin Bonham View Post
    The player getting the norm needs to score all their points over the board rather than by forfeit, ...
    Thanks
    So what's your excuse? To run like the devil's chasing you.

    See you in another life, brotha.

  8. #23
    CC Grandmaster Capablanca-Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA (formerly Brisbane, and before that Wellington, NZ)
    Posts
    20,524
    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelBaron View Post
    If the reason for the forfeits was purely ''lost of motivation'' (as suggested by Alex in his blog) then I wonder if NZ chess Federation has something to say about it.
    Presumably.

    Does anyone know if there is a set penalty if he had failed to turn up against Stojić and thus destroyed norm eligibility, instead of doing the fight thing as he did? Does it ever happen that a player extorts a norm aspirant for money, threatening a no-show if not paid, and what sanctions are imposed on such a lowlife?
    “The history of the 20th century is full of examples of countries that set out to redistribute wealth and ended up redistributing poverty.”
    “There’s no point blaming the tragedies of socialism on the flaws or corruption of particular leaders. Any system which allows some people to exercise unbridled power over others is an open invitation to abuse, whether that system is called slavery or socialism or something else.”—Thomas Sowell

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. George Trundle Masters 2017
    By heligan in forum New Zealand Chess
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-10-2017, 02:20 AM
  2. George Trundle Masters 2016
    By slyall in forum New Zealand Chess
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 18-07-2016, 11:45 AM
  3. George Trundle Masters and Challengers
    By heligan in forum New Zealand Chess
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 21-10-2014, 08:17 PM
  4. George Trundle Masters/Qualifiers 2013
    By Keong Ang in forum New Zealand Chess
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 06-10-2013, 01:26 PM
  5. George Trundle Masters/Reserve
    By GinoTHEstud in forum New Zealand Chess
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 11-10-2012, 06:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •