Remember a few months ago (It was actually 27-06-2012, 05:06 PM) where responding in an Igor Goldenberg post in regards to fair systems of FIDE delegates,
I stated the following:Originally Posted by Igor_Goldenberg
You 've seen nuthin' yet bro! Giv' em a couple of years and you 'll find that no tournament will be recognised unless
- it's FIDE approved and rated
- run by FIDE approved organisers.
- officiated by FIDE approved arbiters.
- Its participants are financial FIDE members.
Further developments will include
- Zone authorities to act as some kind of Polit bureau heavies
- National federations will play the role of kolhoz and sovhoz organisers
- State Associations will act like tax collectors with their treasurers as enforcing officers
(*)
Then the clubs wil come in and tell them all to go get stuffed and let's play chess!
Well that was a few months ago.
Then, earlier this morning I received on my mail the latest ACF News Letter by the acting Editor Dr Kevin Bonham.
The Arbiter Registration article reads as follows:
Arbiter Registration
FIDE are introducing a new Arbiter Licence system under which arbiters of rated tournaments must be licenced, so that if a FIDE tournament uses an unlicenced arbiter then the tournament will not be rated, from 1 Jan 2013 onwards.
The licences are notionally for life, but can be lost if an arbiter becomes inactive, requiring a further payment to reactivate. For details see http://arbiters.fide.com/
An untitled arbiter who wishes to be appointed for a FIDE-rated tournament will therefore need to be registered as a National Arbiter. An inactive arbiter who wishes to be appointed for a FIDE-rated tournament will need to reactivate.
I have proposed at this stage - but note that this is not binding and may change - that:
- the ACF will pay the licence fees for the existing active IAs and FAs (except if there is any special reason to believe a specific arbiter will not make further use of their title.) The ACF will also pay the licence fee when an arbiter qualifies for an FA or IA title in future.
- inactive titled arbiters will need to pay licence fees to the ACF for the level they wish to reactivate at.
- untitled arbiters will need to pay licence fees to the ACF in order to become FIDE National Arbiters. It doesn't matter whether these fees are paid by the arbiter or by an organiser seeking to use them.
The list of licence fees can be seen at item 6 of http://www.fide.com/fide/handbook.ht...&view=category
The ACF needs to notify FIDE of who the initial registered arbiters will be by 5 December. So that the ACF can co-ordinate payments, all inactive titled arbiters wishing to become licenced in order to run a FIDE-rated tournament in the near future, and all untitled arbiters wishing to be arbiters in FIDE-rated tournaments in the near future, need to contact me by email by 21 November.Alternatively, an organiser wishing to use an inactive titled arbiter or untitled arbiter, and willing to pay the fee on their behalf, needs to contact me by the same time. We will get back to you to make payment arrangements after 21 Nov.
(After the current process concludes, new registrations will of course be possible, but it is not yet clear how long they will take to process, so I recommend any organiser who plans to use an untitled or inactive arbiter in a tournament soon to ensure they are registered now.)
I can be contacted at k_bonham@tassie.net.au or if that doesn't work drkjbonham@gmail.com
The current active titled arbiters - who do not need to contact me at this stage (I will contact any special cases) are:
Anastasia Sorokina, Gary Bekker, Charles Zworestine, Roland Eime, Graeme Gardiner, Garvin Gray, Peter Parr, Kevin Perrin, Cathy Rogers, Peter Tsai, Jamie Kenmure, Kerry Stead, Brian Jones (approval pending).
The current inactive titled arbiters according to FIDE are:
John Frew, Evelyn Koshnitsky, Jason Lyons, Susan Margan, Morris Needleman, Alan Thomas, Manuel Weeks.
- Kevin Bonham, ACF Delegate to FIDE
ER I have touched nothing in the original text. I 've only decreased the font size in order to save space. All emphasis, bolding, underlying etc are left as in Dr Bonham’s original. ER
Well, it looks as FIDE didn't wait that long to confirm my fears.
On the other hand it's encouraging to see ACF coming to the party and footing the bill of what looks like could be a financial burden for our arbiters.
It's also good that our tournaments would be arbitered by recognised officials!
The question now lays wih the practicality of implementing the new rule. It might be easy for the big states to have their tournaments FIDE rated. What about places like South Australia, Tasmania, and Western Australia though?
Well apart from a few minor (or not so minor) hiccups everything seems to be OK isn't it?
It's not!
Go back to my original prediction and read again:
Well, I hope it remains a prediction and I will be proven wrong!Originally Posted by JaK