Exactly.Originally Posted by Paul S
the innuendo was deliberate.Originally Posted by Bill Gletsos
I realise that and thats why I said it would get you into trouble (In my opinion more from the BB posters than the target of the innuendo).Originally Posted by ggrayggray
amiel can have his fun if he likes, ill just ignore his comments and not reply to him.Originally Posted by Bill Gletsos
Now everyone should follow our model. You can see for yourselves the results achieved by the ACT!Originally Posted by jenni
![]()
Thanks jenni for all that. It scoped for me the amount of coaching at the Aus. Junior.Originally Posted by jenni
regards
starter
Teach me to write too much in the evening and not proof read properly - or maybe it was wishful thinking.Originally Posted by Libby
![]()
I bet the Mercure were happy with the accommodation bill for that many coachesOriginally Posted by Libby
![]()
okay, seems my net is back up now, no idea for how long though.
no cause act didnt stay at mercureOriginally Posted by pax
they decided instead to crowd us organisers in instead by staying either side of us practically
![]()
We had to keep an eye on you somehow.....Originally Posted by ggrayggray
Actually 7 of the ACT's 38 kids stayed at the Mercure i.e nearly 20%.
And, as I pointed out to George et al - the ACT children at the Mercure were all travelling with parents. Many of those in the Lodges were not. So 7 players (20%) at the Mercure represented a higher percentage of the actual ACT presence in Mt Buller.Originally Posted by jenni
But still, we were so mean and unsupportive ...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)