Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    CC Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,539

    Illegal entrance, AKA "boat people"

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/poli...-1225851808797
    Does it only apply to boat arrival or to lawful visa applicants ad well?
    Squeaks from refugee groups are expected, but the following one is amusing:

    “Kpac” of Adelaide captured the sense of outrage: “This is a disgrace... bowing to the dog whistlers...where oh where are all the leaders in our country? we are happy to reap benefits of a globalised world but are not prepared to do some of the hard work associated with playing our part when globalised problems enter our shores ... Disgusted (and disappointed) life long Labor voter”.
    I doubt this Kpac would vote differently next time. At least that must be Labor reasoning.

    Abbott summarised it pretty much correctly:
    suspension was “an admission by the government that its policies have failed”.

    “This is an admission by the government that it was always pull factors not push factors that was causing the flow of boats.

    “Well, I'm all in favour of tough action, but I want tough action that works and the test of this latest government policy will be: will the boats stop coming? Senator Evans has all but admitted this morning that he doesn't expect it will. So this is policymaking on the run which is almost bound to fail.”
    For private coaching (IM, four times VIC champion) call or SMS 0417519733
    Computer tells you what to play. Good coach explains why.

  2. #2
    CC Grandmaster Spiny Norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    4,437
    For months now, Rudd, Gillard, Evans, et al, have been protesting about the so-called "push factors" and said that their policies had nothing to do with the big increase in the number of boats coming (leaving aside the fact that the UNHCR knew full well and would have told the Australian government that overall world refugee movements were not increasing).

    Now they are changing their policies to try to reduce the number of boats.

    Either they were willfully deceitful earlier (because they knew full well it was pull factors), or they are just plain stupid now (doing something they know cannot affect push factors).

    Oh ... that's right ... its an election year ... gotta be seen to be doing something.
    “As you perhaps know, I haven't always been a Christian. I didn't go to religion to make me happy. I always knew a bottle of port would do that. If you want a religion to make you feel really comfortable, I certainly don't recommend Christianity.” -- C.S.Lewis

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Arbiter's Corner: Notes & Queries
    By arosar in forum Arbiters' Corner
    Replies: 397
    Last Post: 08-03-2019, 08:03 PM
  2. What constitutes an illegal move in blitz?
    By Bereaved in forum Arbiters' Corner
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-12-2009, 10:43 PM
  3. Illegal move/Unlawful move
    By Jesper Norgaard in forum Arbiters' Corner
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 28-10-2009, 08:42 AM
  4. Chesscafe article
    By Garvinator in forum Arbiters' Corner
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 22-02-2007, 03:55 PM
  5. Pressing the clock before promoting
    By Kevin Bonham in forum Arbiters' Corner
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 07-01-2005, 11:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •