Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    CC International Master Paul Cavezza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009

    Opening books in general- which series do you find good/bad

    Most opening books start the same way: "Chess is a game of learning and not memory", and then they go on to give 400 lines with often poorly worked out variations coupled with games and or few explanations of the moves in the lines themselves.

    I've found this particularly with the Everyman books, they're so popular but they use games in lieu of actually explaining the opening ideas usually which I hate.

    The best books for me have been older books, from the 70's which list games afterwards in small print without explanation (especially of the endgames!) but which explain the positional and tactical ideas much better.

    Anyway- would just thought i'd ask if anyone had a series or book which actually does explain these chess ideas through opening study rather than just starting with the endless "memory is the devil, play this: e4,e5,Nf3,Nf6.........................." and so on until boredom or lack of understanding tears us apart

  2. #2
    Account Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Ive got a few chess books which are very good.

    In one it has 30 games which he goes over explaining each move with their general reason and plan and mentioning what the reader should learn from the game. The second half of the book is deep theory and variations.

    Another the Tromposky by Wells slowly explains the plans and reasons and why some moves are bad.

    I find that books written away from the main publishers are excellent as the author has less restrictions on space and time limits.

  3. #3
    CC Grandmaster Garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    the City
    I am mid-1800's and I have found that the "Starting Out" books seem to be getting advanced enough for me these days.

    I have a couple of books which are slightly more advanced such as Watson's general d4 book but that's about it.

    I probably wouldn't bother with multiple volume "Openings according to Kramnik" or the like as I simply can't remember that much, although that type of book may be useful after the game to check out where you go wrong.


  4. #4
    CC Candidate Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Quality Chess appears to be one to keep an eye on. Mihail Marin in particular has been getting great reviews and I was impressed by the book I picked up.

  5. #5
    CC Grandmaster Capablanca-Fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Atlanta, GA (formerly Brisbane, and before that Wellington, NZ)
    As a general rule, trust specialized opening books only on lines favoured by top players, no matter who the author is. There is usually a good reason why other openings are rare at the top. Winning with the Ruy López is fair, because even the world champs played this to try to win; but be skeptical of Winning with the Four Knights, otherwise why don't more top players try it?

    I endorse IM John Watson's review of GM John Nunn's book Secrets of Practical Chess:

    I would like to draw the reader's attention to one superb piece of writing called "Books on Offbeat Openings." I suspect that I read more of such books than Nunn does, so I was delighted and impressed with his insights into them. He gets right to the essence of the matter, pointing out a number of dubious tendencies such books normally exhibit, for example: (a) they claim that "recent games" justify a previously-discredited opening (Nunn points out that the games are usually by unknown players and don't stand up to examination); (b) the authors of these books "display great ingenuity in finding resources for 'their' side, but often overlook even quite simple tactical defenses for the 'other' side" (how true!); (c) the author's analysis includes both "nothing moves" by the opponent and variations in which the opponent grabs all the offered material and cooperates in a glorious self-immolation (when in both cases, rational continuations were available).

    The great thing is that Nunn backs this criticism up by examining two such books by GMs: Tony Kosten's The Latvian Gambit and Andy Soltis' Winning with the Giuoco Piano and the Max Lange Attack. Tackling the former book first, he simply devastates Kosten's analysis of 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.Nxe5 Nc6, and then does the same for Kosten's main line of 3...Qf6 4.Nc4 fxe4 5.Nc3 Qf7 6.Nc3 c6. In typical Nunn style, this takes four pages of what appears to me to be flawless analysis. He then turns his attention to Soltis' book and in a further four pages, simply refutes Soltis' superficial "analysis" of both of Black's main defenses in the most critical variations. After Nunn finishes, Black has two ways of getting an advantage versus a line with which White is supposed to be able to "win!" This exercise is vintage Nunn: devastating and path-breaking at the same time.

    ... On the essential point, however, Nunn says what has long been needed to be said about such books. I can confirm from extensive experience that the type of errors he discovers are indeed rampant in typical books on offbeat openings, and in my opinion, they are at least as egregious in books written by grandmasters as in those by mere masters (who as a rule seem to work harder).
    “The history of the 20th century is full of examples of countries that set out to redistribute wealth and ended up redistributing poverty.”
    “There’s no point blaming the tragedies of socialism on the flaws or corruption of particular leaders. Any system which allows some people to exercise unbridled power over others is an open invitation to abuse, whether that system is called slavery or socialism or something else.”—Thomas Sowell

  6. #6
    Monster of the deep Kevin Bonham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono
    As a general rule, trust specialized opening books only on lines favoured by top players, no matter who the author is. There is usually a good reason why other openings are rare at the top. Winning with the Ruy López is fair, because even the world champs played this to try to win; but be skeptical of Winning with the Four Knights, otherwise why don't more top players try it?
    I'm pleased to say there is no Winning with the Four Knights (and the few books on it are generally honest about its lack of any objective plus) but it is seen at 2600+ level on a reasonable basis and sometimes even higher than that. Malakhov, Motylev, Short, Vallejo, Movsesian, Grischuk, Svidler, Smirin, Mamedyarov, Leko, Shirov, Nakamura, Khalifman etc all in the last decade, most more than once and not all while playing for draws either.

    The reason the Four Knights is rare at the top is that there is no objective advantage worth speaking of and therefore against well-playing booked-up opposition it is very likely to be a draw.

    But at club level almost anything is playable, even things a great deal worse than the Four Knights.

    I think what people need to watch out for is books that exaggerate the prospects of openings not seen at the very top level. Those books generally do have all the flaws Watson and Nunn attribute to them, and a further danger is that if a club player plays the lines included in them, even if they do so successfully, they don't develop a rounded game.

    So if a book is making wild claims about some line that is never seen at top level then that is a good reason to be extremely suspicious about it. But if a book explores a less-than-cutting-edge opening and is honest that the opening is not going to score you 86% against your own rating, then it might be a good book.

    I'm pretty sceptical of books entitled "Winning with the ..." in general, whatever they claim to be winning with. "Beating the ..." is a similarly dubious title. But there are probably some good books in these categories.
    Moderation Requests: All requests for, comments about, or questions about moderation of any kind including thread changes must be posted in the Help and Feedback section and not on the thread in question. (Or by private message for routine changes or sensitive matters.)

    ACF Newsletter Information - All Australian players and administrators should subscribe and check each issue for relevant notices

    My psephology/politics site (token chess references only) : Politics twitter feed

  7. #7
    CC International Master Bereaved's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Hi everyone,

    The book "Winning with the Queen's Indian" features 5 black wins, about 12 draws, and about 25 white wins, in my perhaps inaccurate recollection. Hard to see where the "winning with" part comes into such a

    Take care and God Bless, Macavity
    It is not a matter of God being on your side; it is a matter of being on God's side that matters

  8. #8
    CC International Master Paul Cavezza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    My view is that your average 16-1800 player will lose a "significant" opening advantage within 1-10 moves of attaining it and gain nothing more than an "slight" middle game advantage in most cases.

    Games at our level are usually decided by oversights or strategical ignorance rather than "opening advantages."

    Which is why I was asking about books that forgo the study of "lines" for a more step by step strategical analysis of each move in an opening/game!

    In any case- am happy with the "winning with the X" bashing direction the thread has taken!
    Last edited by Paul Cavezza; 18-12-2009 at 08:53 AM.

  9. #9
    CC International Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Fundamental chess openings is basically a new bible for players who want to know plans and theory. Really great stuff. Check out all the reviews, they concur.
    And still, no one has satisfactorily proven, that it isn't opposite day.

  10. #10
    CC Grandmaster Adamski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Penrith, NSW

    Revolutionize Your Chess

    A new book Revolutionize Your Chess by Ivanchuk's GM trainer now resident in Spain (Viktor Moskalenko) is really good. The opering treatment in his section on Openings and their link to middle game (and even ending) does not focus on learning lines, but rather as it should on ideas. he only picks a few openings dure to space limitations, one being the Stonewall Dutch. As I say on my own web site in my sig, I have always struggled with memorising long lines, so I endorse those writers who get us away from that demoralising practice for us club level players.
    Last edited by Adamski; 01-02-2010 at 01:36 PM. Reason: Spelling
    God exists. Short and to the point.

    Secretary of, and regularly arbiter at, Rooty Hill RSL Chess Club. See

    Psephological insight. "Controversial will only lose you votes. Courageous will lose you the election." Sir Humphrey Appleby on Yes Minister.

    Favorite movie line: Girl friend Cathy to Jack Ryan in "Sum of all Fears". "What kind of emergency does an historian have?".

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Charles Robert Darwin 1809-1882
    By antichrist in forum Religion and Science
    Replies: 150
    Last Post: 04-09-2013, 02:18 PM
  2. My Chess Reading Schedule, please critique
    By KentDMc in forum Chess Training
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 01-02-2013, 06:07 PM
  3. Chess Books - Bird's Opening Timothy Taylor
    By Davidflude in forum General Chess Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-09-2007, 11:31 PM
  4. drown or swim in opening theory
    By qpawn in forum Chess Training
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-10-2006, 09:45 PM
  5. Can Members Attend Meetings Nswca?
    By antichrist in forum Australian Chess
    Replies: 159
    Last Post: 08-06-2005, 11:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts