Why a moderator should be allowed to abuse one of the "patrons"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by firegoat7

This is the third time you have split my posts because they involve you.

---

What a load of frothy rubbish.

I did not "split your post" - I simply chose to respond to it on a different thread to the one on which it was made - one which was more relevant.

No moderator actions were performed and any poster could have done the same thing.

I expect you to acknowledge that your accusation was false; if you do not I will conclude that you have a problem admitting when you are wrong and that you are also therefore hypocritical (again).

Quote:

---

If you think I am being abusive then you ought to remember that you and Bill are the official judges of what is and what is not abuse. Bill defined idiot as not being abusive.

---

If it is a reference to you, "idiot" is certainly not abusive. :lol:

a person deficient in mind and permanently incapable of rational conduct

Jokes aside, "idiot" is most certainly abuse but it is permitted on this board in the vast majority of cases, and deserved in no small number of them. As moderator, I am not interested in what is abuse and what is not so your comment above is ineffectual rubbish as usual.

My point is that you were being abusive, in this case while I was merely criticising your opinions (albeit dismissively) and that this undermines and exposes as hypocritical your attempts to criticise others for being abusive.

Again from same thread but not worth splitting as it's only one post, another firegoat whine about the incredible injustice of me commenting on some of his posts on threads other than the ones they originate on. (firegoat, have you told the UN commission on war crimes about this? I strongly suspect they may be interested, surely my behaviour puts Slobodan Milosevic in the shade?)

Quote:

---

Does anybody else suffer this sort of treatment from the Control Freak?

---

I'll answer your question with a question: does anybody else deserve it?

The fact that you consider yourself to "suffer" when this occurs proves that you are too thinskinned.

(I think I have done the same thing with Matthew, probably David, perhaps others at times. None of them whined over nothing like you do, you pathological victim.)

I'm so suprised it took you so long to ban these two. Were they drunk?:lol: